USPTO serial 74047507
LSI GRAPHIC EVIDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 1994
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LSI GRAPHIC EVIDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip A. Jones
PHILIP A JONES WILLIAN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production of video presentations and computer-generated animation for use as exhibits in legal proceedings, and consulting services in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 1988 |
| 042 | creating charts, graphs, illustrations, and scale models for use as exhibits in legal proceedings, and consulting services in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Litigation Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Litigation Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Litigation Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LSI GRAPHIC EVIDENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |