USPTO serial 74047928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliott I. Pollock
ELLIOTT I POLLOCK POLLOCK, VANDE SANDE & PRIDDY1990 M ST N W #800P O BOX 19088WASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |