USPTO serial 74048596
MAGGIE MUGGINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGGIE MUGGINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin Komen
EDWIN KOMEN CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded motion picture films, magnetic tapes, audio and video tapes, cassettes and cartridges, phonograph records, compact discs, bio-discs and digital audio tapes, all of musical, narrative or theatrical performances | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | sheet music | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of theater; motion picture films production services; radio and television entertainment production services; and recording studio services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |