USPTO serial 74048755
PANTHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANTHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sybil Meloy
SYBIL MELOY RUDEN, BARNETT, MCCLOSKY, SMITH, ET ALSTE 1900701 BRICKELL AVEMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches and jewelry sold only in connection with and in promotion of a professional baseball team | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1992 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1990 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |