Drawing for PANTHERS

USPTO serial 74048759

PANTHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O LEAR, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PANTHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sybil Meloy

SYBIL MELOY RUDEN, BARNETT, MCCLOSKY, SMITH, ET ALSTE 1900701 BRICKELL AVEMIAMI, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021containers; namely, plastic mugs, water bottles, foam can holders, ceramic mugs, ceramic tankards, drinking glasses, shot glasses, and vacuum bottles all related to, and in promotion of, a professional baseball teamABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 1992ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance