USPTO serial 74048763
PANTHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANTHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SYBIL MELOY, ESQ
SYBIL MELOY ESQ RUDEN, BARNETT, MCCLOSKY, ET AL701 BRICKELL AVE STE 1900MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely, puzzles, kites, balloons, baseballs, bats, gloves, teddy bears, plush toys, baseball helmets, inflatable sports toys, namely bats, jigsaw puzzles; sporting goods, namely, golf bags, golf club head covers, golf tees, beachballs, golf clubs, bases, pinwheels, yoyos, balls, puppets, baseball action figures, and toy vehicles related to major league baseball | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |