USPTO serial 74049537
THE PAINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PAINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Beard
JOHN L BEARD GODFREY & KAHN, SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nancy Kahn Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nancy Kahn Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named THE PAINT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |