USPTO serial 74049538
GIORGIO ARMANI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIORGIO ARMANI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store services, namely directing, coordinating and supervising conduct of retail establishments including providing financial accounting and bookkeeping services, coordinating purchase of merchandise and distribution of inventory and supervising implementation of marketing and advertising strategy | ABANDONED | May 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |