USPTO serial 74049891
NECTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2004564Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 1996
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NECTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
County Antrim, BT38 8XX, GB
County Antrim, BT38 8XX, GB
CARRICKFERGUS, COUNTY ANTRIM BT38 8XX, GB
County Antrim, BT38 8XX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN NIKAIDO MARMELSTEIN MURRAY & ORAM LLPMETROPOLITAN SQ STE 330G ST LOBBY 655 15TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes; toilet soap; essentail oils for personal use and for use as ingredients in the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; hair care products; namely, hair lotions, shampoos, conditioners, hair gels, hair sprays and henna powders; face care products; namely, foundation creams, colored powders, blushes, concealer pencils, facial scrubs, and neck gels; eye care products; namely, eye make-up, eye make-up cleansers, eye gel, mascara, eyeshadows, eye powder pencils, eyebrow pencils, eye pencils, lipsticks, lip balms, and lip shines; nail care products; namely, nail polish, nail poslish remover, base coats, nail hardeners, ridge fillers, and anti-nail bite; bath care products; namely, bath pearls, bubble bath, bath oils, bath salts, bath relaxers, foam baths, and washing gel; facial treatments; namely, cleansing lotions, moisture lotion, skin fresheners, moisture creams, ointments, hand creams, and flower waters; hand and body products; namely, massage oils, body scrubs, cream or wax depilatory treatments, hand and body creams, hand and body lotions, deodorants, perfume oils, eau d'parfum, aromatherapy oils, shaving soap, after shave oils/lotions, balms, foot lotions, nappy cream, body lotions and oils, sun lotions, after sun preparations and refresher oils for sale through retail outlets operating under the name nectar, either alone or in combination with other terms and which are owned, franchised, licensed and/or controlled by the trademark owner | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BS RETAILING UK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NECTAR BEAUTY SHOPS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NECTAR OVERSEAS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NECTAR BEAUTY SHOPS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NECTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |