Drawing for EVERICH

USPTO serial 74050285

EVERICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Bikoff, Esq.

JAMES L BIKOFF ESQ BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; namely, personal computers compromised of terminals, minitors, video boards floppy and hard disk drives, keyboards and printers and structural components therefor; computer software for use in computer aided design, graphics, local area networks, desktop publishing and data base managementABANDONED—
037istallation and maintenance services of computer hardware and softwareABANDONED—
042computer consulting servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 25, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 12, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 15, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance