USPTO serial 74051501
MILLENNIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2043906Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 1997
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MILLENNIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur H. Seidel
ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | non-electric bakeware; non-electric housewares; namely, meal trays, serving trays not of precious metal, serving platters not of precious metal, canister sets, containers for foods, containers for kitchen use not of precious metal, kitchen storage racks and household utensils; namely, kitchen ladles, serving spoons, spatulas, mixing spoons, serving forks, slotted spoons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |