USPTO serial 74052498
PROFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1777158Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 1993
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scotts Valley, CA
Scotts Valley, CA
Scotts Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLYN TAYLOR
ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | electronic musical instruments; namely, multi-timbral digital sound modules for providing digital sound reproduction of various types of sounds, including pianos, organs, strings, horns, guitars, basses, drums and percussion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 20, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |