USPTO serial 74052644
XELON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XELON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor M. Tannenbaum
VICTOR M TANNENBAUM ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | business management and accounting computer programs and user manuals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |