USPTO serial 74053060
DEBON ART DE PEAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 1993
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEBON ART DE PEAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Yongdungpo-ku, Seoul, KR
Yongdungpo-ku, Seoul, KR
Yongdungpo-ku, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK, ET AL633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, skin lotion, massage cream, toilet cream, cleansing cream, foam cleansing, nutritious oil for cosmetic use, creamy pack, astringent for cosmetic use, moisture cream, rich cream, eye cream, sun tanning oil, sun block lotion, jelly cream, sun block cream, super sun cream, eye shadow, packaged in a compact, mascara and brush for applying mascara sold as a unit, cream foundation, powder foundation and brush sold as a unit, make up powder packaged in a compact, lip gloss, lipstick, lacquer for manicure, liquid foundation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2003 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 1, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |