USPTO serial 74054358
LOCATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth E. Krosin
KENNETH E KROSIN LOWE, PRICE LEBLANC, BECKER & SHUR99 CANAL CTR PLZSTE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware for locating, tracking and recovering mobile articles including automobiles, trucks, boat, ships and other vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |