Drawing for GROUP TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 74054445

GROUP TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRAVERMAN, TODD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROUP TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred W. Hathaway

FRED W HATHAWAY VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software and hardware for the enhancement of collaboration and communication among groups via computer networks, telecommunications data links and other meansABANDONED—
042computer consulting services primarily for the enhancement of collaboration and communication among groups via computer networks, telecommunications data links and other meansABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 19, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance