USPTO serial 74054472
INTERAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Dunn
MICHAEL L DUNN DUNN & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 96NEWFANE, NY 14108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio tapes and video tapes for use by individuals and organizations, which tapes are intended to improve interpersonal as well as intrapersonal, group and organizational communication processes and skills, including but not limited to such topics as leadership, finance, budgeting, marketing, creativity, public speaking, management skills, decision making, strategic planning, conflict management, critical thinking, organizational culture, team building, persuasion, total quality management, consulting techniques, and the like | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed matter; namely, books and pamphlets on the subject of intrapersonal group and organizational communication processes and skills, including but not limited to such topics as leadership, finance, budgeting, marketing, creativity, public speaking, management skills, decision making, strategic planning, conflict management, critical thinking, organizational culture, team building, persuasion, total quality management, consulting techniques, and the like | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1993 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |