USPTO serial 74055502
THIRSTYSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THIRSTYSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard R. Mybeck
RICHARD R MYBECK8010 E MORGAN TRAILSTE 10SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-1234Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | natural sandstone coasters | ABANDONED | Mar 16, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |