Drawing for PALACE

USPTO serial 74056264

PALACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PALACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Baldauf

KENT E BALDAUF WEBB, BURDEN, ZIESENHEIM & WEBB, PC700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009motion picture films; blank audio and video tapes; pre-recorded audio and video tapes and discs featuring motion picture films, promotional videos, music performances, television programs, cartoons, games and motion picture soundtracks; blank compact discsABANDONED—
041motion picture film, videotape and television production services; distribution of motion picture films and videotapes; motion picture film and videotape rental services; motion picture film and video production equipment rental servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance