Drawing for UNITED KIDS

USPTO serial 74056280

UNITED KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jesse Rothstein

JESSE ROTHSTEIN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018children's, adults' and infants' back packs, back packs in the shape of animals, tote bags, all purpose sport bags, fanny packs and waist packs and diaper bagsABANDONEDAug 10, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 11, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 8, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 1992SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 6, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 7, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance