Drawing for Serial No. 74056479

USPTO serial 74056479

Serial No. 74056479

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74056479?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Crozier

JOHN H CROZIER1934 HUNTINGTON TPKETRUMBULL, CT 06611-5116UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007manual pumps, namely bilge pumps for removing water from watercraftABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 16, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 1, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 8, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 15, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance