USPTO serial 74056479
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Crozier
JOHN H CROZIER1934 HUNTINGTON TPKETRUMBULL, CT 06611-5116UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | manual pumps, namely bilge pumps for removing water from watercraft | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |