USPTO serial 74056865
PRIME ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIME ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Saltzman
ERIC T SALTZMAN STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH660 NEWPORT CTR DR STE 1600P O BOX 7680NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6441Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security system to warn a supervising adult of unauthorized entrance into a swimming pool area, namely, infrared, electronic, sound, and light based motion detectors and sensors which transmit information to a central processing unit which sounds an alarm in the event of entrance to the area surrounding a swimming pool or the swimming pool | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |