USPTO serial 74057796
LIGHTNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St-Leonard, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Garvey
GEORGE A GARVEY SHLESINGER & MYERS3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | modular concrete pouring forms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |