USPTO serial 74058312
TAAKA PLATINUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2042131Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 1997
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TAAKA PLATINUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
LOUISVILLE, KY
New Orleans, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd S. Bontemps
Todd S. Bontemps COOLEY LLP1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | vodka | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sazerac Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sazerac Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAZERAC BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sazerac Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TAAKA PLATINUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |