Drawing for BAD BABY

USPTO serial 74058639

BAD BABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUPO, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAD BABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. Eichler, Esq.

PETER M EICHLER COOPER, EPSTEIN & HUREWITZ345 N MAPLE DR3RD FLBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028board games, card games, parlor games, pinball games, computer games, electronic games, video output machine games, table games, sport balls, rubber balls, foam balls, rollerskates, badminton rackets, dolls and accessories therefor, plush toys, toy cars and trucks, toy rockets, jigsaw puzzles, bubble making wands, toy banks, puppets, toy action figures, doll houses or play sets, balloons; sports helmets for baseball, hockey, and football; sports gloves for baseball, hockey, karate, and softball; baseball bats and tees, hockey sticksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 1991ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance