USPTO serial 74059030
Serial No. 74059030
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74059030?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Browne
ROBERT E BROWNE VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601-1003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | loudspeakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |