USPTO serial 74059194
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Crozier
JOHN H CROZIER1934 HUNTINGTON TPKETRUMBULL, CT 06611-5116UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements, namely, vitamins, minerals and electrolytes in pill form | ABANDONED | Jan 23, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |