Drawing for A'PRI-O'RI

USPTO serial 74059453

A'PRI-O'RI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A'PRI-O'RI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy N. Cohen

AMY N COHEN LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601-6780

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software design and consulting servicesABANDONEDJun 12, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 30, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance