USPTO serial 74059625
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Flynn
THOMAS W FLYNN BIEBEL & FRENCH2500 KETTERING TWRDAYTON, OH 45423UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | nuts and snacks; namely, processed nuts, mixed nuts; processed pumpkin seeds; shredded coconuts; processed sunflower seeds; dried fruit snacks; trail mix consisting of blanched peanuts, sesame sticks, raisins, shelled sunflower kernels, cashews and almonds; snack mix comprising raw nuts and preserved fruits pieces; and cajun party mix comprising barbecued peanuts, taco sesame sticks, dry roast peanuts and seasoning | ABANDONED | Jan 18, 1991 |
| 030 | yogurt-coated natural nuts, honey roast peanuts, rice cracker mix and bread sticks | ABANDONED | Jan 18, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |