USPTO serial 74059857
ALPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Eunpyong-ku, Seoul, KR
Eunpyong-ku, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | components of motor vehicle air conditioning systems; namely, air purifying units and air filtering units | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |