Drawing for TELECAR

USPTO serial 74059964

TELECAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1661508Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 22, 1991
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELECAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis S. Gillow

LOUIS S GILLOW CARELLA, BYRNE, BAIN & GILFILLAN6 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electric track vehicle conveyor system for use as a delivery system within buildings comprising electric track, delivery vehicles, interface stations, traffic switches, supervisory display panels, and power suppliesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 2, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 1994C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 25, 1994CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 1993PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 30, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1990CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance