USPTO serial 74060255
JUMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Ronald Riches
C RONALD RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESP O BOX 12109, 700-555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin lotions and creams, cleansing lotions and creams, facial masks, undercover foundation, make up foundation, face powders, bath and shower gels, dusting powders, bath powders, milk baths, talcum powders, bath and shower oils, eyebrow pencils, eye liner pencils, eye shadows, mascaras, nail polishes, lip pencils, lipsticks, rouges, perfumes, colognes, soaps, deodorants, hair shampoos and conditioners, hair sprays | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | lotions and creams having therapeutic and medicinal characteristics, astringents, acne lotions and creams | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |