USPTO serial 74060571
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dave Fehrman
DAVE FEHRMAN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZ650 TOWN CTR DR STE 1930COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycles and structural parts thereof | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |