USPTO serial 74061338
THE LOTTO PHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 1992
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE LOTTO PHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Atlantic City, NJ
Atlantic City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. Mentlik
WILLIAM L MENTLIK LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | conducting lotteries for others by telephone | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 21, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 29, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |