USPTO serial 74061716
STRATIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRATIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 7052001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical systems and their parts and accessories namely, power feed connectors, cable poles, junction boxes, power distribution channels, receptacles, festoon plug harnesses, conduit panel jumpers, openend distribution channels | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | office furniture system, namely various work surfaces and working tables, filing cabinets and storage modules, panels and structural rails | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |