USPTO serial 74061741
Serial No. 74061741
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74061741?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven H. Bazerman
STEVEN H BAZERMAN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | canned goods; namely, canned ginseng root and processed chicken | ABANDONED | May 18, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |