Drawing for MARX

USPTO serial 74061841

MARX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1776628Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 1993
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James David Jacobs

AMERICAN PLASTIC EQUIPMENT INC101 S 15TH STSEBRING, OH 44672UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys; namely, toy playsets containing toy figures, toy buildings, toy vehicles, and toy trees, ride-on plastic animals and vehicles, miniature play figures such as cowboys, indians, soldiers and the like, action skill games and action target games, sports manipulative games, toy plastic kitchen utensils and toy appliances and doll housesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 9, 1919

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 30, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 22, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 28, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 17, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 16, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 1999C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 15, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 13, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 1, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance