USPTO serial 74062031
MOMENTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOMENTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. SCOTT CARSON
W SCOTT CARSON DORR, CARSON, SLOAN & PETERSON3010 E 6TH AVEDENVER, CO 80206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | grouping of five medicated footcare products designed to combat various problems associated with excess and prolonged use of the feet; namely, foot powder, foot bath, menthol rub, foot moisturizing lotion, and anti-fungal rub | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |