Drawing for BAC A DOUCHE DEVICE

USPTO serial 74062541

BAC A DOUCHE DEVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BAC A DOUCHE DEVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon D. Coplein

GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY, PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009television, video, remote controllers, telecopiers, sound recorders and data recorders sold individually or as a group of two or more of the foregoing; computers, microcomputers, microprocessors; office machines; namely, word processors, photocopiers, accounting machines, adding machines, calculators, dictating machines, invoicing machines; scrambler and de-scrambler units; prerecorded and blank sound recording media in the form of records, magnetic tapes, discs, and cassettes; computer programs use in and for telecommunicationsABANDONED—
016paper and paper articles; namely, stationary, computer printing paper, photocopy paper, telecopy paper; cardboard articles; namely, cardboard files, stationary, and packaging; printed materials; namely, technical manuals, printed software programs; publication, books, magazines, directories, dictionaries, journals and newspaper for the computer, telephone, telecommunications field, printers, word processorsABANDONED—
035services relating to data processing services, distribution of data and information by video and audioABANDONED—
038telecommunication servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance