USPTO serial 74063989
ARETAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 1992
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARETAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo M. Fairbairn
JO M FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGESTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated hair care preparations; namely, conditioners/reconstructurers, nutrient supplements for hair and scalp, shampoos, hair sprays, and hair gels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |