USPTO serial 74064334
TELEM-A-CELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREER, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELEM-A-CELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Fields
PAUL FIELDS DARBY & DARBY805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for gaseous flow measurement and correction in pipelines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |