USPTO serial 74064695
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wood River, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph W. Kalish
RALPH W KALISH KALISH & GILSTER500 N BROADWAY STE 1200ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | handmade glass giftware; namely, candlestick holders, bowls, candy dishes, baskets, votive candleholders, decorative ornamental bells, goblets, tumblers, plates, cups, punch bowls and covered dishes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |