USPTO serial 74064889
PET VALU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASH, LAURA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PET VALU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, M1X 1C6, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, M1X 1C6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Bryan
JAY K. MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pet supplies; namely, pet flea and tick powders and sprays; pet shampoos | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | pet supplies; namely, pet combs and pet brushes | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | pet toys; namely, rubber, nylon and rope bones; rubber, latex and vinyl squeeze toys; stuffed toys for cats with and without catnip; rope tugs; rubber, vinyl and latex balls | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | pet foods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PET VALU INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PET VALU INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PET VALU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |