USPTO serial 74065105
THE NEXT GENERATION OF FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE NEXT GENERATION OF FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1100 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat-based entrees; poultry-based entrees; fish-based entrees; vegetable-based entrees; soups; salad dressing; mayonnaise; potato chips; potatoes in puff form; processed vegetables in chip or puff form; cheese; milk; milk based food beverages; yogurt; processed fruit based meal substitute nutritional bars; dairy-based food beverages; and vegetable based food beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | pasta-based entrees; rice-based entrees; breakfast cereals, processed cereal-based breakfast food bars; processed grain-based meal substitute bars for nutritional purposes; granola bars; candy; ice-cream; frozen yogurt, pudding, chutneys; relishes; sauces; pastry; pies; cakes; muffins; buns; rolls; bread; cookies; crackers; bagels; pizza; mixes for making cakes, cookies, bread and rolls; corn chips, puffed corn snacks; popped popcorn; and grain based food beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | fruit juices; vegetable juices; carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, soft drinks; and non-alcoholic wine coolers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named THE NEXT GENERATION OF FOOD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |