USPTO serial 74065630
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. M. Creedon
V M CREEDON WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACKSOUTHERN BLDG STE 700805 FIFTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | air breathing apparatus for use in non-medical emergencies, and underwater breathing apparatus for sports scuba diving, and parts therefor | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |