USPTO serial 74066269
CREO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1764083Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 1993
- Examiner
- RATTNER, HEIDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Rochester, NY
BURNABY, B.C, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terria P. Jenkins
Terria P. Jenkins Eastman Kodak Company343 State StreetRochester, NY 14650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Direct write heads for exposing processless films using lasers; laser diode [ rays ] * arrays * ; film recorders image recorders, computer programs for diagnosing, operating and interfacing laser diode [ rays ] * arrays * , film recorders, image recorders, direct write heads, photo plotters and parts thereof; [ electronic equipment; namely, data storage equipment, optical data storage equipment and laser recording equipment for producing tiny holes in tape to permanently record data on the tape in a highly condensed form; audio or video tape recorders, optical tape recorders, ] direct write plotters, graphic arts recorders, [ micro plotters, lasers, stereo lithography equipment and micro lithography equipment ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 1986 |
| 042 | custom design of electronic equipment; namely, electro-optical inspection equipment used in the manufacture of optical storage media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CREO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CREO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CREO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CREO PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CREO PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CREO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |