USPTO serial 74066346
IRIDIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IRIDIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunication equipment, namely satellites, gateways, satellite stations and control apparatus therefor; and subscriber units | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |