USPTO serial 74066859
THE HEALTH VIDEO LIBRARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 1993
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE HEALTH VIDEO LIBRARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Halvorson
DAVID R HALVORSON BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded videotapes or disks featuring instruction on medical topics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Jan 12, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Oct 29, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Oct 22, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 13, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |