USPTO serial 74066881
ATI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Newman
JOHN C NEWMAN99 CANAL CTR PLZSTE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting conferences, round tables, and seminars in the field of U. S. federal income taxation | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |