USPTO serial 74067197
SOFT TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFT TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc Phillip Bodner
MARC PHILIP BODNER2358 81 ST STBROOKLYN, NY 11214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | eye liners, eye pencils, eye shadow and mascara | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |